Monitoring and Evaluation Model Construction for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Productive Zakat Management in BAZNAS Malang Regency

Authors

  • Minarni Minarni Universitas Gajayana Malang, Indonesia
  • Rosida Dwi Ayuningtyas Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah, Kedah Malaysia
  • Reni Qurroti Aeni National University, Australia
  • Moh. Imron Universitas Gajayana Malang, Indonesia
  • Dwi Yulis Susanto Universitas Gajayana Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/mzw.2026.8.1.101-122

Keywords:

productive zakat; monitoring; evaluation; BAZNAS Malang Regency

Abstract

Productive zakat is a strategic Islamic philanthropic instrument in overcoming poverty and encouraging the improvement of the welfare of mustahiq (recipients of zakat). Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS) of Malang Regency has implemented monitoring and welfare improvement programs for productive zakat to encourage community economic independence. However, its effectiveness has not been optimal, especially since performance indicators are not yet integrated, sustainable, and based on Islamic spiritual values. BAZNAS Malang Regency still faces limitations in sustainable mentoring and long-term impact measurement. This study aims to describe and analyze the implementation of monitoring and evaluation of productive zakat programs, as well as construct an effective model to improve program performance and impact. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design. Informants included BAZNAS administrators, mustahiq, and stakeholders, who were selected purposively. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation, then analyzed using content analysis with triangulation of sources and methods. The results indicate that monitoring and evaluation have been carried out in a structured manner, but limited sustainable mentoring and variations in business capacity remain obstacles. Therefore, strengthening the monitoring and evaluation system, business mentoring, reporting documentation, and stakeholder collaboration are needed to improve the effectiveness of productive zakat management. The novelty of this research is a continuous improvement-based model that integrates results-based monitoring and evaluation with the values ​​of amanah, ihsan, and hisbah to increase the effectiveness of productive zakat management

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah. “Integrasi Nilai Maqashid Syariah dalam Evaluasi Zakat Produktif.” Journal of Islamic Economics 7, no. 2 (2025).

Arif, Z., et al. “Outcome Accountability in Zakat Institutions.” International Journal of Zakat 10, no. 1 (2025).

Arifin, Zainal, and Anwar. “Productive Zakat and Post-Disaster Economic Recovery.” Journal of Islamic Social Finance 6, no. 2 (2021): 101–118.

Aziz, A. “Optimization Strategy of Productive Zakat Funds.” Journal of Social Research 3, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v3i2.1964.

Badan Amil Zakat Nasional Provinsi Jawa Timur. Laporan Kinerja Pendistribusian dan Pendayagunaan Zakat Tahun 2023. Surabaya: BAZNAS Provinsi Jawa Timur, 2023.

Badan Amil Zakat Nasional Republik Indonesia. Tata Kelola BAZNAS RI. Jakarta: Badan Amil Zakat Nasional, 2023.

BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang. Laporan Kegiatan BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang Tahun 2020. Malang: BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang, 2020.

———. Laporan Kegiatan BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang Tahun 2021. Malang: BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang, 2021.

———. Laporan Kegiatan BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang Tahun 2022. Malang: BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang, 2022.

———. Laporan Kegiatan BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang Tahun 2023. Malang: BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang, 2023.

———. Laporan Kegiatan BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang Tahun 2024. Malang: BAZNAS Kabupaten Malang, 2024.

Bahri, E., and Z. Arif. “Analisis Efektivitas Penyaluran Zakat.” Al-Maal 2, no. 1 (2020).

Bakewell, Oliver, and Anne Garbutt. The Use and Abuse of the Logical Framework Approach. London: SIDA, 2005.

Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.

Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

Fadilah, S., et al. “Performance Measurement of Zakat Utilization.” KnE Social Sciences (2023).

Fauzi. “Evaluasi Pemberdayaan Zakat Produktif Berbasis Kinerja.” Jurnal Manajemen Zakat 4, no. 1 (2025).

Firdausa, M., and U. Usnan. “Efektivitas Penyaluran Zakat Produktif.” JUEBIR 2, no. 2 (2023).

———. “Effectiveness of Productive Zakat Programs in Surakarta.” Journal of Islamic Economic Studies 11, no. 2 (2023): 89–105.

Hamidi, M. Luthfi, et al. “Productive Zakat as a Strategy for Poverty Alleviation.” International Journal of Zakat 5, no. 1 (2020): 1–15.

———. “The Impact of Productive Zakat on MSME Income in South Sumatra.” International Journal of Zakat 5, no. 1 (2020): 45–60.

Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E. Shannon, “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis,” Qualitative Health Research 15, no. 9 (2005): 1278–1288.

Iswanto, B., et al. “Cattle Fattening Program.” Shirkah 8, no. 2 (2023).

Khatimah. “Model Pentahelix dalam Pengelolaan Zakat Produktif Daerah.” Jurnal Kebijakan Publik 9, no. 1 (2024).

Khafsoh, N. “Monitoring dan Evaluasi Program Zakat Produktif pada BAZNAS Daerah.” Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 13, no. 2 (2021).

———. “Dialektika Pengelolaan Zakat Produktif.” Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Indonesia 4, no. 1 (2021).

Klaus Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2018), 24.

Kusek, Jody Zall, and Ray C. Rist. Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Handbook for Development Practitioners. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2004.

Kyngäs Helvi, Mervi Kääriäinen, and Maria Elo, “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process,” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62, no. 1 (2008): 107–115.

Mabrukah, H., et al. “Transformation of Zakat into Rotating Business Capital.” JIESBE (2024).

Mardiasmo. Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2018.

Maulana, A., and A. Adli. “Optimizing Zakat Management.” Alhamdulillah 3, no. 2 (2024).

Mawardi, Ahmad, et al. “The Impact of Productive Zakat on Mustahik Welfare in Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Economics 14, no. 2 (2022): 155–172.

Muliati, A., et al. “The Accountability and Distribution of Productive Zakat.” Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (2020).

Norman K. Denzin, The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, 3rd ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989), 237–241.

OECD Development Assistance Committee. Quality Standards for Development Evaluation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2010.

Patton, Michael Quinn. Essentials of Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2012.

Qodiryani, M., and E. Amelia. “The Effectiveness of Productive Zakat Distribution on the Welfare Level of Mustahiq.” At-Tijaroh 8, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24952/tijaroh.v8i2.5963.

Rohma, and Pujiati. “Effectiveness of Productive Zakat Distribution in Jombang.” Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy 10, no. 1 (2025): 23–38.

Rois, et al. “The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation in Program Management.” Journal of Development Policy and Management 6, no. 2 (2019): 67–82.

Romdhoni, Abdul Haris. “Zakat Produktif dan Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Umat.” Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 9, no. 1 (2017): 45–60.

Santoso, I., et al. “Mediating Effects of Islamic Business Success.” International Journal of Business and Society (2024).

Saputra, A. “Model Pengembangan Zakat Produktif.” Qawānīn 8, no. 2 (2024).

———. “Productive Zakat Development Models in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam.” Journal of Islamic Philanthropy and Governance 7, no. 1 (2024): 1–18.

Siti Karunia, and Fajar Amir. “Productive Zakat Distribution in Improving Mustahik Welfare: CIBEST Model Approach.” Journal of Enterprise and Development 6, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v6i2.9723.

Sutrisno, and R. Haron. “Increasing the Role of Zakat Institutions in Poverty Reduction.” Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews 8 (2020): 1243–1250.

Tran. “Symbolic Accountability in Public Organizations.” Public Administration Review 80, no. 3 (2020).

United Nations Development Programme. Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results. New York: UNDP, 2009.

Wijaya, M., and A. Ritonga. “Improvement of Community Welfare through Productive Zakat Empowerment.” Fitrah 7, no. 1 (2021).

Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2014.

Za, et al. “The Cak Kaji BAZNAS Program and Coastal Community Empowerment in Gresik.” Journal of Islamic Social Finance 8, no. 1 (2025): 45–62.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Minarni, M., Dwi Ayuningtyas, R., Qurroti Aeni, R., Imron, M., & Susanto, D. Y. (2026). Monitoring and Evaluation Model Construction for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Productive Zakat Management in BAZNAS Malang Regency. Management of Zakat and Waqf Journal (MAZAWA), 8(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.15642/mzw.2026.8.1.101-122

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.