The Dark and Bright Side of UBO Transparency: Switching Potential, Product Cannibalism, and Sales Performance in the Banking Industry

Main Article Content

Edy Saptono
Ignatius Hari Santoso

Abstract

Abstract


Objective – This study investigate the dual effects of Ultimate Beneficial Ownership transparency on managerial perceptions and banks performance within multi – bank ownership structures. Specifically, the research examines how UBO transparency shapes perceived switching potential, product cannibalism potential and bank sales performance, highlighting both the bright and dark sides of ownership disclosure in the banking sector.


Design/methodology/approach – A quantitative, cross sectional survey is conducted involving 121 managerial level employee from Indonesian commercial banks operating under shared ownership groups. Using Partial Least Square SEM, the study assessed the measurement model and tested the structural relationship between UBO transparency, perceived switching potential, product cannibalism potential and sales performance.


Findings – The result reveal a dual mechanism of UBO transparency. On the hand, transparency significantly increase perceived switching potential, suggesting that ownership visibility may enhance the customers’ sense of substitutability across affiliated banks. On the other hand, transparency significantly reduce perceived product cannibalism indicating that improved clarity roles across related institutions. Additionally, perceived switching potential positively influence the sales performance, while product cannibalism potential negatively affects affects it.


Research limitations/implications – The cross sectional design and relies solely on managerial perception, limiting the causal inference and potentially introducing perceptual bias. The sample is restricted to Indonesian banks under share ownership, may limit the generalizability.


Practical implications – The findings underline the need for banks to strategically manage the UBO transparency, ensuring that ownership is accompanied by clear differentiation strategies across affiliated brands.


Originality/value – This study is among the first to integrated the governance transparency, managerial perception and customer related outcomes into a unified framework in the banking context. It extends Agency Theory and Signaling Theory by demonstrating that UBO transparency produces simultaneous bright and dark effects, including competitive perception which unexplored in ownership transparency literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saptono, E., & Santoso, I. H. (2026). The Dark and Bright Side of UBO Transparency: Switching Potential, Product Cannibalism, and Sales Performance in the Banking Industry. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Inovasi (MANOVA), 9(2), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.15642/manova.v9i2.2615
Section
Articles

References

Anderson, E.W., Fornell, C., & Mazvancheryl, S.K. (2004). Customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 172 – 185, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.172.42723

Anderson, G., Martin, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Customer satisfaction, loyalty behaviors, and firm financial performance: What 40 years of research tell us. Marketing Letters, 34, 171-187, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09671-w

Amberger, H.J., Wilde, J.H., & Wu, Y. (2022). Ownership transparency and corporate monitoring. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(5), 1501 – 1542, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12431

Amberger, H.J., Wilde, J.H., & Wu, Y. (2025). Cross-border investment, detterence and compliance effects of ownership transparency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 80(2), 101809, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101809

Cambier, F., Poncin, I. (2020). Inferring brand integrity from marketing communication: the Effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context. Journal of Business Research, 109, 260-270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.060

Clemens, M.D., Gan, C., & Zheng, L.Y. (2018). Customer switching behavior in the banking industry: a Multiple discriminant analysis. Internationala Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(7), 1256 – 1275, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2017-0036

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Connelly, B.L, Certo, S.T., Ireland, R.D., & reutzel, C.R. (2011). Signaling theory: a Review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39 – 67, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Crama, Y., Hubner, G., Leruth, L., & Renneboog, L. (2021). Identifying ultimate beneficial owners: a Risk based approach to improving tha transparency of international financial flows. CENTER Discussion Paper Series, 2021 – 2027, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3937565

De Giovanni, P., & Ramani, V. (2018). Product cannibalization and the effect of a service strategy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(3), 340 - 357, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0224-5

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J.A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a Comparison and empirical ilustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263 – 282, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39 – 50, https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Friske, W., Hoelscher, S.A., & Nikolov, A.N. (2023). The impact of voluntary sustainability reporting on firm value: Insights from Signaling Theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(2), 372 – 392, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00879-2

Ejiogu, A., Denedo, M., Egbon, O., & Lauwo, S. (2025). The translucence of transparency: Extractive industry beneficial ownership disclosure as an emering transparency regime. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 102806, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102806

Ejiogu, A., & Olayinka, A. (2023). Transparency, disclosure, and unintented consequences in governance reform. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(7), 1889 – 1912, https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2022-6017

Gan, C., Clemens, M., & Zheng, L. (2019). Determinants of customer switching behavior in financial services. Service Industries Journal, 39(9), 713 – 734, https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1511786

Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with application. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(35), 320 – 328, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) 2nd edition. Sage Publications.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least square equation modeling (PLS-SEM) 3rd edition. Sage Publication

Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115 – 135, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Homburg, C., Steiner, V.V., & Totzek, D. (2019). Managing dynamics in a customer portfolio. Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 65-84, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242918818348

Jayarajan, D., Siddarth, S., & Silva-Riso, J.M. (2018). Cannibalization vs competition: an Empirical study of the impact of product durability on automobile demand. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(4), 641 – 660, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.001

Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305 – 360, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kim, M., Park, M., & Jeong, D. (2021). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barriers on customer loyalty in the banking sector. Service Business, 15(3), 523 – 546, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-021-00440-3

Menezes, M.B.C., & Pinto,R. (2022). Product proliferation, cannibalisation and substitution: a First look into entailed risk and complexity. International Journal of Production Economics, 243, 108327, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108327

Misbah, S., & Abdelhalem, T.R. (2021). Financial performance, firm value, transparency and corporate governance: Evidence from family owned businesses. Journal of Financial Resporting and Accounting, 19(3), 386 – 407, https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2021-0008

Ng, K.W., & Wolfs, B. (2025). Impact of customers’ satisfaction, values, habit and switching cost on switching to Hong Kong digital banks. SBS journal of Applied Business Research, 13(1), https://doi.org/10.70301/JOUR/SBS-JABR/2025/13/1/5

Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill

Okorie, O. (2021). A triple bottom line examination of product cannibalization and remanufacturing: a Review and research agenda. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1528 – 1544, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.013

Rawis, S.O., Nasution, R.A., Hadiansyah, L.S., Adiani, W., & Aprianingsih, A. (2025). Systematic literature review of switching behavior in the service industry. Binus Business Review, 13(1), https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v13i1.7618

Renming, L., Hamid, A.B.A., Yakub, N.I., & Jiyu, S. (2024). Switching behavior in social commerce: the Role of perceived behavioral control, information overload and avoidance intentions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(2), 1554 – 1566, http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v14-i2/9735

Samiee, S., Saaksjarvi, M., Harmancioglu, N., & Erik, J. (2020). International cannibalization, radical innovation, and performance: a Comparison of Chinese and Western Enterprises in China. Journal of International Marketing, 28(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X19866832

Sansone, K., Conduit, J., & Wilkie, D. (2025). Consumer deman transparency but do they actually engage? Exploring motives and interaction with brand transparency information. Journal of Business Research, 115386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115386

Sansone, K., Wilkie, D., & Conduit, J. (2023). Beyond information availability: Specifying the dimension of consumer perceived brand transparency. Journal of Business Research, 152, 114358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114358

Sezen, B., Pauwels, K., & Ataman, B. (2023). How do line extension impact brand sales? The role of feature similarity and brand architecture. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(3), 537 – 550, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00265-z

Sun, C., Ji, J., & Meng, X. (2025). Transparency as a trust catalyst: How self disclosure strategies reshape consumer perception of unhealthy food brands on digital platform. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 133, https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020133

Su, Q., Namin, A., & Ketron, S. (2024). The role of persuasion by significant others and engagement in bank switching intention. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 29(4), 1279 – 1290, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-024-00293-5

Xu, L. (2025). A clustering method for product cannibalization detection using price effect. Electronics, 14(15), 3120, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153120

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a Comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4). 801 – 814, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976

Yang, J., & Battocchio, A. (2021). Effects of transparent brand communication on perceived brand authenticity and consumer responses. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 30(8), 1176 – 1193, DOI:10.1108/JPBM-03-2020-2803

Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2024). Demand cannibalization during product rollovers in the presence of strategic customers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 103785, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.10378